Implementasi Algoritma Pengambilan Keputusan dan Pendekatan Key Requirement untuk Pemilihan Vendor dalam Penawaran Perangkat Telekomunikasi
Abstract
Pengaruh persepsi kualitas merupakan permasalahan klasik dalam suatu proses pemilihan vendor (bidding). Untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut telah banyak digunakan algoritma dalam pengambilan keputusan. Dalam makalah ini telah dilakukan identifikasi kebutuhan team planning dan optimalisasi skema bidding menggunakan key of requirement untuk meminimalkan pengaruh persepsi kualitas. Metode Kano Model Analysis, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) digunakan untuk menganalisis dan menentukan key requirement dalam proses bidding perangkat telekomuniasi yang dibutuhkan team planning. Pemilihan vendor berdasarkan spesifikasi key of requirement dilakukan dalam enam tahap, yaitu tahap persiapan, identifikasi requirement, penentuan spesifikasi key of requirement, pemilihan vendor, uji akurasi dan kesimpulan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kebutuhan planning dan new architecture dari penyedia layanan telekomunikasi dapat dikelompokkan menjadi NFVi dan service. Kriteria penting dari pembangunan NVFi (Hardware) yaitu Virtual Infrastructure Management (VIM) dengan bobot 22% sedang kriteria service yaitu Fixed Services dengan bobot 50,94%. Berdasarkan hasil analisis juga diperoleh nilai preferensi dari masing-masing vendor (supplier) perangkat telekomunikasi.
Downloads
References
[2] S. O. Viarani and H. R. Zadry, “Analisis Pemilihan Pemasok dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process di Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang,” J. Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 14, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 55–70, Apr. 2016.
[3] M. A. Setyawan and S. Winiarti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Supplier Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” J. Sarj. Tek. Inform. Vol 2, No 3 Oktober, Oct. 2014.
[4] M. Zoghi, G. Rostami, A. Khoshand, and F. Motalleb, “Material selection in design for deconstruction using Kano model, fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology,” Waste Manag. Res., 2022.
[5] S. Avikal, R. Jain, and P. K. Mishra, “A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., 2014.
[6] R. Singh, S. Avikal, R. Rashmi, and M. Ram, “A Kano model, AHP and TOPSIS based approach for selecting the best mobile phone under a fuzzy environment,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 2020.
[7] S. Kilaparthi and N. Sambana, “Prioritization of supplier selection attributes using fuzzy kano model analysis,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., 2017.
[8] M. L. Yao, M. C. Chuang, and C. C. Hsu, “The Kano model analysis of features for mobile security applications,” Computers and Security. 2018.
[9] Shilpa Parkhi, Aishwarya Banerjee, “RPA Vendor Evaluation and Selection using AHP and Kano Model,” Psychol. Educ. J., 2021.
[10] A. Mdallal and A. Hammad, “Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) to reduce concrete waste on construction sites,” in Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 2019.
[11] P. O. Akadiri, P. O. Olomolaiye, and E. A. Chinyio, “Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects,” Autom. Constr., 2013.
[12] D. N. Chen, P. J. H. Hu, Y. R. Kuo, and T. P. Liang, “A Web-based personalized recommendation system for mobile phone selection: Design, implementation, and evaluation,” Expert Syst. Appl., 2010.
[13] M. C. Chen, C. L. Hsu, and L. H. Lee, “Investigating pharmaceutical logistics service quality with refined Kano’s model,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 2020.
[14] M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, and J. Antucheviciene, “Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of MADM approaches,” Econ. Res. Istraživanja, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1073–1118, Jan. 2017.
[15] K. Palczewski and W. Sałabun, “The fuzzy TOPSIS applications in the last decade,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2019.
[16] A. Bilbao-Terol, M. Arenas-Parra, V. Cañal-Fernández, and J. Antomil-Ibias, “Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds,” Omega (United Kingdom), 2014.
[17] O. Jadidi, F. Firouzi, and E. Bagliery, “TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2010.
[18] R. K. Singh, S. Kansara, and N. K. Vishwakarma, “Vendor rating system for an Indian start-up: a combined AHP & TOPSIS approach,” Meas. Bus. Excell., 2018.
[19] K. Wiegers and J. Beatty, Software requirements, 3rd ed. Pearson Education, 2013.
[20] Supriady, W. Resdiana, and N. A. Zahirah, “Pemilihan Vendor Pengadaan Barang Tingkat Kabupaten Menggunakan Metode Saw (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Mar. 2019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
